Recognizing measurable community benefit

Equity, Accessibility & Community Impact

Definition, evidence, and examples of what qualifies for recognition in this category.

NominateJudging process

Category definition

Leadership that measurably expands access, fairness, and community outcomes — especially for underserved groups — with clear evidence of impact and accountability.

Measurable impact

What judges look for

  • Outcomes measured and, when appropriate, disaggregated
  • Improved accessibility and equitable access to services
  • Community-aligned design and feedback loops
  • Responsible implementation and transparency
  • Sustainable operations for continued benefit

Strong evidence

  • Access metrics (coverage, participation, completion)
  • Equity impact measures (before/after disparities)
  • Community engagement evidence and program changes
  • Accessibility compliance outcomes where applicable
  • Independent evaluations or documented outcomes

Examples of measurable outcomes

  • Reduced disparities in access or service outcomes
  • Improved accessibility and user experience measurably
  • Expanded service reach via community partnerships
  • Measured increases in participation/completion rates
  • Improved outcomes for priority populations

Nominate in this category

Ready to nominate a leader for Equity, Accessibility & Community Impact?

Go to nomination form Back to categories
Tip: Include metrics, scope, constraints, and evidence. Avoid general praise without outcomes.